The Therapeutic Relationship Is the Most Important Ingredient in Successful Therapy

"Maybe if I have this client blink his eyes at anthat Rogers recommends (1961) asking yourself as a
increased speed, while exposing him to his past, andclinician concerning the development of a helping
add some cognitive behavioral therapy while sittingrelationship. These questions should be explored
next to a waterfall, he may be able to function moreoften and reflected upon as a normal routine in your
effectively in his life!" Yes this is rather exaggerated,clinical practice. They will help the clinician grow and
however it demonstrates the idea that ascontinue to work at developing the expertise needed
professionals in the field of therapy, we often seekto create a strong therapeutic relationship and in turn
complex theories, techniques, and strategies to morethe successful practice of therapy.
effectively treat our consumers. A large amount of1. Can I be in some way which will be perceived by
our precious time is spent seeking new theories andthe client as trustworthy, dependable, or consistent in
techniques to treat clients; evidence for thissome deep sense?
statement is shown by the thousands of theories2. Can I be real? This involves being aware of
and techniques that have been created to treatthoughts and feelings and being honest with yourself
clients seeking therapy.concerning these thoughts and feelings. Can I be who
The fact that theories are being created and the fieldI am? Clinicians must accept themselves before they
is growing is absolutely magnificent; however wecan be real and accepted by clients.
may be searching for something that has always3. Can I let myself experience positive attitudes
been right under our nose. Clinicians often enjoytoward my client - for example warmth, caring,
analyzing and making things more intricate that theyrespect) without fearing these? Often times clinicians
actually are; when in reality what works is ratherdistance themselves and write it off as a
simple. This basic and uncomplicated ingredient for"professional" attitude; however this creates an
successful therapy is what will be explored in thisimpersonal relationship. Can I remember that I am
article. This ingredient is termed the therapeutictreating a human being, just like myself?
relationship. Some readers may agree and some may4. Can I give the client the freedom to be who they
disagree, however the challenge is to be openare?
minded and remember the consequences of5. Can I be separate from the client and not foster a
"contempt prior to investigation".dependent relationship?
Any successful therapy is grounded in a continuous6. Can I step into the client's private world so deeply
strong, genuine therapeutic relationship or morethat I lose all desire to evaluate or judge it?
simply put by Rogers, the "Helping Relationship".7. Can I receive this client as he is? Can I accept him
Without being skilled in this relationship, no techniquesor her completely and communicate this acceptance?
are likely to be effective. You are free to learn,8. Can I possess a non-judgmental attitude when
study, research and labor over CBT, DBT, EMDR,dealing with this client?
RET, and ECT as well as attending infinite trainings on9. Can I meet this individual as a person who is
these and many other techniques, although withoutbecoming, or will I be bound by his past or my past?
mastering the art and science of building aEmpirical Literature
therapeutic relationship with your client, therapy willThere are obviously too many empirical studies in this
not be effective. You can even choose to spendarea to discuss in this or any brief article, however
thousands of dollars on a PhD, PsyD, Ed.D, and otherthis author would like to present a summary of the
advanced degrees, which are not being put down,studies throughout the years and what has been
however if you deny the vital importance of theconcluded.
helping relationship you will again be unsuccessful.Horvath and Symonds (1991) conducted a Meta
Rogers brilliantly articulated this point when he said,analysis of 24 studies which maintained high design
"Intellectual training and the acquiring of informationstandards, experienced therapists, and clinically valid
has, I believe many valuable results--but, becoming asettings. They found an effect size of .26 and
therapist is not one of those results (1957)."concluded that the working alliance was a relatively
This author will attempt to articulate what therobust variable linking therapy process to outcomes.
therapeutic relationship involves; questions cliniciansThe relationship and outcomes did not appear to be
can ask themselves concerning the therapeutica function of type of therapy practiced or length of
relationship, as well as some empirical literature thattreatment.
supports the importance of the therapeuticAnother review conducted by Lambert and Barley
relationship. Please note that therapeutic relationship,(2001), from Brigham Young University summarized
therapeutic alliance, and helping relationship will beover one hundred studies concerning the therapeutic
used interchangeably throughout this article.relationship and psychotherapy outcome. They
Characteristic of the Therapeutic Relationshipfocused on four areas that influenced client outcome;
The therapeutic relationship has severalthese were extra therapeutic factors, expectancy
characteristics; however the most vital will beeffects, specific therapy techniques, and common
presented in this article. The characteristics mayfactors/therapeutic relationship factors. Within these
appear to be simple and basic knowledge, although100 studies they averaged the size of contribution
the constant practice and integration of thesethat each predictor made to outcome. They found
characteristic need to be the focus of every clientthat 40% of the variance was due to outside
that enters therapy. The therapeutic relationshipfactors, 15% to expectancy effects, 15% to specific
forms the foundation for treatment as well as largetherapy techniques, and 30% of variance was
part of successful outcome. Without the helpingpredicted by the therapeutic relationship/common
relationship being the number one priority in thefactors. Lambert and Barley (2001) concluded that,
treatment process, clinicians are doing a great"Improvement in psychotherapy may best be
disservice to clients as well as to the field of therapyaccomplished by learning to improve ones ability to
as a whole.relate to clients and tailoring that relationship to
The following discussion will be based on theindividual clients."
incredible work of Carl Rogers concerning the helpingOne more important addition to these studies is a
relationship. There is no other psychologist to turn toreview of over 2000 process-outcomes studies
when discussing this subject, than Dr. Rogers himself.conducted by Orlinsky, Grave, and Parks (1994),
His extensive work gave us a foundation forwhich identified several therapist variables and
successful therapy, no matter what theory orbehaviors that consistently demonstrated to have a
theories a clinician practices. Without Dr. Rogerspositive impact on treatment outcome. These
outstanding work, successful therapy would not bevariables included therapist credibility, skill, empathic
possible.understanding, affirmation of the client, as well as the
Rogers defines a helping relationship as , " aability to engage the client and focus on the client's
relationship in which one of the participants intendsissues and emotions.
that there should come about , in one or bothFinally, this author would like to mention an interesting
parties, more appreciation of, more expression of,statement made by Schore (1996). Schore suggests
more functional use of the latent inner resources of"that experiences in the therapeutic relationship are
the individual ( 1961)." There are three characteristicsencoded as implicit memory, often effecting change
that will be presented that Rogers states arewith the synaptic connections of that memory
essential and sufficient for therapeutic change as wellsystem with regard to bonding and attachment.
as being vital aspects of the therapeutic relationshipAttention to this relationship with some clients will
(1957). In addition to these three characteristics, thishelp transform negative implicit memories of
author has added two final characteristic that appearrelationships by creating a new encoding of a positive
to be effective in a helping relationship.experience of attachment." This suggestion is a topic
1. Therapist's genuineness within the helpingfor a whole other article, however what this
relationship. Rogers discussed the vital importance ofsuggests is that the therapeutic relationship may
the clinician to "freely and deeply" be himself. Thecreate or recreate the ability for clients to bond or
clinician needs to be a "real" human being. Not an alldevelop attachments in future relationships. To this
knowing, all powerful, rigid, and controlling figure. Aauthor, this is profound and thought provoking. Much
real human being with real thoughts, real feelings, andmore discussion and research is needed in this area,
real problems (1957). All facades should be left out ofhowever briefly mentioning it sheds some light on
the therapeutic environment. The clinician must beanother important reason that the therapeutic
aware and have insight into him or herself. It isrelationship is vital to therapy.
important to seek out help from colleagues andThroughout this article the therapeutic relationship has
appropriate supervision to develop this awarenessbeen discussed in detail, questions to explore as a
and insight. This specific characteristic fosters trust inclinician have been articulated, and empirical support
the helping relationship. One of the easiest ways tofor the importance of the therapeutic relationship
develop conflict in the relationship is to have ahave been summarized. You may question the validity
"better than" attitude when working with a particularof this article or research, however please take an
client.honest look at this area of the therapy process and
2. Unconditional positive regard. This aspect of thebegin to practice and develop strong therapeutic
relationship involves experiencing a warm acceptancerelationships. You will see the difference in the
of each aspect of the clients experience as being atherapy process as well as client outcome. This
part of the client. There are no conditions put onauthor experiences the gift of the therapeutic
accepting the client as who they are. The clinicianrelationship each and every day I work with clients.
needs to care for the client as who they are as aIn fact, a client recently told me that I was "the first
unique individual. One thing often seen in therapy istherapist he has seen since 9-11 that he trusted and
the treatment of the diagnosis or a specific problem.acted like a real person. He continued on to say,
Clinicians need to treat the individual not a diagnostic"that's why I have the hope that I can get better
label. It is imperative to accept the client for whoand actually trust another human being." That's quite
they are and where they are at in their life.a reward of the therapeutic relationship and process.
Remember diagnoses are not real entities, howeverWhat a gift!
individual human beings are.Ask yourself, how you would like to be treated if
3. Empathy. This is a basic therapeutic aspect thatyou were a client? Always remember we are all part
has been taught to clinicians over and over again,of the human race and each human being is unique
however it is vital to be able to practice andand important, thus they should be treated that way
understand this concept. An accurate empatheticin therapy. Our purpose as clinicians is to help other
understanding of the client's awareness of his ownhuman beings enjoy this journey of life and if this
experience is crucial to the helping relationship. It isfield isn't the most important field on earth I don't
essential to have the ability to enter the clientsknow what is. We help determine and create the
"private world" and understand their thoughts andfuture of human beings. To conclude, Constaquay,
feelings without judging these (Rogers, 1957).Goldfried, Wiser, Raue, and Hayes (1996) stated, " It
4. Shared agreement on goals in therapy. Galileo onceis imperative that clinicians remember that decades of
stated, "You cannot teach a man anything, you canresearch consistently demonstrates that relationship
just help him to find it within himself." In therapyfactors correlate more highly with client outcome
clinicians must develop goals that the client would likethan do specialized treatment techniques."
to work on rather than dictate or impose goals onReferences
the client. When clinicians have their own agenda andConstaquay, L. G., Goldfried, M. R., Wiser, S., Raue,
do not cooperate with the client, this can causeP.J., Hayes, A.M. (1996). Predicting the effect of
resistance and a separation in the helping relationshipCognitive therapy for depression: A study of unique
(Roes, 2002). The fact is that a client that is forcedand common factors. Journal of Consulting and Clinical
or mandated to work on something he has noPsychology, 65, 497-504.
interest in changing, may be compliant for theHorvath, A.O. & Symonds, B., D. (1991). Relation
present time; however these changes will not bebetween a working alliance and outcome in
internalized. Just think of yourself in your personal life.psychotherapy: A Meta Analysis. Journal of Counseling
If you are forced or coerced to work on somethingPsychology, 38, 2, 139-149.
you have no interest in, how much passion or energyLambert, M., J. & Barley, D., E. (2001). Research
will you put into it and how much respect will youSummary on the therapeutic relationship and
have for the person doing the coercing. You maypsychotherapy outcome. Psychotherapy, 38, 4,
complete the goal; however you will not remember357-361.
or internalize much involved in the process.Orlinski, D. E., Grave, K., & Parks, B. K. (1994).
5. Integrate humor in the relationship. In this authorsProcess and outcome in psychotherapy. In A. E.
own clinical experience throughout the years, oneBergin & S. L. Garfield (Eds.), Handbook of
thing that has helped to establish a strong therapeuticpsychotherapy(pp. 257-310). New York: Wiley.
relationship with clients is the integration of humor inRoes, N. A. (2002). Solutions for the treatment
the therapy process. It appears to teach clients toresistant addicted client, Haworth Press.
laugh at themselves without taking life andRogers, C. R. (1957). The Necessary and Sufficient
themselves too serious. It also allows them to seeConditions of Therapeutic Personality Change. Journal
the therapist as a down to earth human being with aof Consulting Psychology, 21, 95-103.
sense of humor. Humor is an excellent coping skill andRogers, C. R. (1961). On Becoming a Person,
is extremely healthy to the mind, body, and spirit.Houghton Mifflin company, New York.
Try laughing with your clients. It will have a profoundSchore, A. (1996). The experience dependent
effect on the relationship as well as in your ownmaturation of a regulatory system in the orbital
personal life.prefrontal cortex and the origin of developmental
Before delving into the empirical literature concerningpsychopathology. Development and Psychopathology,
this topic, it is important to present some questions8, 59-87.