| As the representational perception cannot be | | | | the rate given to it, but it has nothing to do with the |
| counted as something that comes directly to the | | | | cognitive time, it can only be used as means to |
| consciousness, the process of perception must be | | | | relatively measure the exceeding cognitive time. If it |
| divided to two levels, the conscious and the | | | | is for example considered that hundred megahertz |
| sub-conscious perception. First there is the state | | | | computer can process hundred million processes in a |
| when photons are received in retina and then send | | | | second and a gigahertz computer one billion |
| to the regions associated to perception, that only | | | | processes in a second, it is obvious that the |
| then after the content generative cycle emerges to | | | | mechanical time exceeds lot faster in the latter |
| the representational perception. The second level is | | | | computer. Thus, as cognitive time awareness is |
| then the conscious perception of the environment, | | | | structured in relativity with artificial measures such as |
| and the value-relative content generation, valuation, | | | | seconds, it is easy to understand why the |
| recombination of information structures related to | | | | misconception of cognitive time would be somehow |
| the perceived information, and so on. These two | | | | different from the Cartesian relativity of measuring |
| states, when combined can be said to be forming | | | | distances or from the Einstein's example of two |
| two distinctively different levels of perception. It is a | | | | trains that move in parallel but in different speeds. |
| common belief that the first level of perception of | | | | Thus, as Einstein explained in his example, the true |
| the environment has been considered as the act of | | | | measurement of speed must be made in relativity |
| conscious perception, although it is in fact only the | | | | with non-moving target in Cartesian sense or by |
| second level of perception, entering approximately | | | | accounting the speed the point of measurement has |
| 100ms after being in contact with the presentation in | | | | to the calculations. In another example, consider the |
| the environment. | | | | registering, reaction and future related valuation rates |
| The second curiosity related to this phenomenon is | | | | when flying five times faster than sound and |
| that information in the representational perception | | | | compare it with being in the waiting room described |
| changes constantly even without producing | | | | earlier. |
| consciously new semantic content to the | | | | Now, as the content in the representational |
| automatically generated content by the | | | | perception exceeds in relativity with the cognitive |
| sub-conscious. The billion gigahertz brains behind the | | | | time, the conscious perception of the content in it |
| consciousness generate constantly information, | | | | are in parallel with the exceeding presentations in the |
| creating as a by-product the sense of cognitive time | | | | environment. But here's the thing. In conscious level, |
| awareness. By cognitive time it is meant the sense | | | | one must focus on the entities in order to be able to |
| of time related to the tasks of producing new | | | | do value-relative changes to the contents |
| content to the consciousness, since if the information | | | | representing the environment. These can be called as |
| flow to consciousness was slower, the sense of time | | | | the focus points that can exist in the level of |
| would be automatically slower and thus the sense of | | | | representations that are not manifested at present in |
| time is also a factor that causes cognitive time to be | | | | the environment or in relations to the phenomena |
| measured in terms of relativity. Let us for example | | | | manifested in the environment at present and thus |
| consider that one is in a waiting room, and that the | | | | the representational perception functions in these |
| sense cognitive time is measured in relativity with the | | | | both levels. As phenomena are outlined and for |
| clock that is in the wall. Seconds exceed, but it | | | | example semantized, it is automatically added to the |
| exceeds in the measures given to the clock, and as | | | | content of it and thus it exists thereafter in the first |
| this clock is an analog clock, the mechanism created | | | | level of perception. |
| to it moves the pointer that represents a second in | | | | |